Is @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf safe to use?

@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf has no known vulnerabilities on the latest version (0.1.3). DepScope rates its health at 61/100 (moderate risk).

What is the latest version of @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf?

The latest version of @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf is 0.1.3, released 2026-02-08.

Does @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf have known vulnerabilities?

No known vulnerabilities on the latest version of @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf.

Is @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf deprecated?

No, @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf is actively maintained. Latest release: 0.1.3 (2026-02-08).

What are alternatives to @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf?

Popular alternatives to @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf in npm include: ?, semver, minimatch, debug, brace-expansion.

What license does @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf use?

@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf is licensed under Apache-2.0.

@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf

npmv0.1.3

Negative binomial distribution probability mass function (PMF).

License Apache-2.0permissive12 versions4 maintainers18 deps295 weekly dl

stdlib-js/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf

/ 100

Health

use with caution

@stdlib/[email protected] low health (61/100) — consider alternatives

Moderate health score (61/100) — verify manually

Health breakdown0 – 100

20/25

maintenance

3/20

popularity

25/25

security

9/15

maturity

4/15

community

Vulnerabilities

none known

Bundle & TypeScript

🌟

TypeScript

10/10typed

bundled

Health History

Dependency Tree

License Audit

Dependencies (18)

API access

Get this data programmatically — free, no authentication.

curl https://depscope.dev/api/check/npm/@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-pmf