Is @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf safe to use?

@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf has no known vulnerabilities on the latest version (0.2.3). DepScope rates its health at 58/100 (high risk).

Does @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf have known vulnerabilities?

No known vulnerabilities on the latest version of @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf.

Is @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf deprecated?

No, @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf is actively maintained. Latest release: 0.2.3 (2026-02-08).

What are alternatives to @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf?

Popular alternatives to @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf in npm include: semver, debug, ansi-styles, minimatch, brace-expansion.

What license does @stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf use?

@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf is licensed under Apache-2.0.

@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf

npmv0.2.3

Natural logarithm of the probability mass function (PMF) for a negative binomial distribution.

License Apache-2.0permissive13 versions4 maintainers19 deps92 weekly dl

stdlib-js/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf

/ 100

Health

use with caution

@stdlib/[email protected] low health (58/100) — consider alternatives

Moderate health score (58/100) — verify manually

Health breakdown0 – 100

20/25

maintenance

0/20

popularity

25/25

security

9/15

maturity

4/15

community

Vulnerabilities

none known

Bundle & TypeScript

🌟

TypeScript

10/10typed

bundled

Health History

Dependency Tree

License Audit

Dependencies (19)

API access

Get this data programmatically — free, no authentication.

curl https://depscope.dev/api/check/npm/@stdlib/stats-base-dists-negative-binomial-logpmf