Is @dword-design/require-package-name-fork safe to use?

@dword-design/require-package-name-fork has no known vulnerabilities on the latest version (0.0.1). DepScope rates its health at 35/100 (critical risk).

What is the latest version of @dword-design/require-package-name-fork?

The latest version of @dword-design/require-package-name-fork is 0.0.1, released 2025-12-12.

Does @dword-design/require-package-name-fork have known vulnerabilities?

No known vulnerabilities on the latest version of @dword-design/require-package-name-fork.

Is @dword-design/require-package-name-fork deprecated?

No, @dword-design/require-package-name-fork is actively maintained. Latest release: 0.0.1 (2025-12-12).

What are alternatives to @dword-design/require-package-name-fork?

Popular alternatives to @dword-design/require-package-name-fork in npm include: ?, debug, ansi-styles, semver, brace-expansion.

What license does @dword-design/require-package-name-fork use?

@dword-design/require-package-name-fork is licensed under MIT.

@dword-design/require-package-name-fork

npmv0.0.1

gets the package name for a require statement

License MITpermissive1 versions1 maintainers0 deps176 weekly dl

mattdesl/require-package-name

/ 100

Health

use with caution

@dword-design/[email protected] low health (35/100) — consider alternatives

Moderate health score (35/100) — verify manually

Health breakdown0 – 100

5/25

maintenance

3/20

popularity

25/25

security

0/15

maturity

2/15

community

Vulnerabilities

none known

Bundle & TypeScript

🌟

TypeScript

10/10typed

bundled

Health History

Dependency Tree

License Audit

API access

Get this data programmatically — free, no authentication.

curl https://depscope.dev/api/check/npm/@dword-design/require-package-name-fork