Is rbx-require-relative safe to use?

rbx-require-relative has no known vulnerabilities on the latest version (0.0.9). DepScope rates its health at 48/100 (high risk).

What is the latest version of rbx-require-relative?

The latest version of rbx-require-relative is 0.0.9, released 2012-02-28.

Does rbx-require-relative have known vulnerabilities?

No known vulnerabilities on the latest version of rbx-require-relative.

Is rbx-require-relative deprecated?

No, rbx-require-relative is actively maintained. Latest release: 0.0.9 (2012-02-28).

What are alternatives to rbx-require-relative?

Popular alternatives to rbx-require-relative in RubyGems include: jmespath, netrc, thread_safe, crass, tzinfo.

What license does rbx-require-relative use?

License information for rbx-require-relative is not declared in the registry metadata.

rbx-require-relative

rubygemsv0.0.9

Ruby 1.9's require_relative for Rubinius and MRI 1.8. We also add abs_path which is like __FILE__ but __FILE__ can be fooled by a sneaky "chdir" while abs_path can't. If you are running on Ruby 1.9 or greater, require_relative is the pre-defined version. The benefit we provide in this situation by this package is the ability to write the same require_relative sequence in Rubinius 1.8 and Ruby 1.9.

17 versions0 deps798,123 weekly dl

http://github.com/rocky/rbx-require-relative

/ 100

Health

use with caution

[email protected] low health (48/100) — consider alternatives

Moderate health score (48/100) — verify manually

Health breakdown0 – 100

0/25

maintenance

14/20

popularity

25/25

security

9/15

maturity

0/15

community

Vulnerabilities

none known

Health History

Dependency Tree

License Audit

API access

Get this data programmatically — free, no authentication.

curl https://depscope.dev/api/check/rubygems/rbx-require-relative